Tham khảo Tâm_lý_học

  1. “How does the APA define "psychology"?”. Truy cập ngày 15 tháng 11 năm 2011. 
  2. “Definition of "Psychology (APA's Index Page)"”. Truy cập ngày 20 tháng 12 năm 2011. 
  3. Fernald LD (2008). Psychology: Six perspectives (pp. 12–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  4. Hockenbury & Hockenbury. Psychology. Worth Publishers, 2010.
  5. Mặc dù việc phân tích tâm lý và những hình thái khác của tâm lý học chuyên sâu thường có liên quan nhiều nhất đến tâm vô thức, những nhà nghiên cứu hành vi xem xét những hiện tượng như phản xạ có điều kiệnphản xạ theo hình thức thưởng phạt (operant conditioning), trong khi những nhà nhận thức học tập trung nghiên cứu những vấn đề như bộ nhớ tiềm ẩn, tính tự động, và thông điệp ngầm, tất cả những thứ đó đều được hiểu là để bỏ qua hoặc xảy ra bên ngoài nỗ lực nhận thức hay sự chú ý. Đương nhiên, những nhà nhận thức-hành vi (tâm lý) trị liệu tư vấn cho những bệnh nhân của họ để trở nên đề phòng với những hình thái suy nghĩ kém tương thích (maladaptive thought patterns), tính tự nhiên của cái mà trước đó những bệnh nhân này chưa hề ý thức.
  6. Cacioppo, John (tháng 9 năm 2007). “Psychology is a Hub Science”. Aps Observer 20 (8). psychology is a hub discipline — that is, a discipline in which scientific research is cited by scientists in many other fields. For instance, medicine draws from psychology most heavily through neurology and psychiatry, whereas the social sciences draw directly from most of the specialties within psychology.  Association for Psychological Science Observer (September 2007)
  7. O'Neil, H.F.; cited in Coon, D.; Mitterer, J.O. (2008). Introduction to psychology: Gateways to mind and behavior (12th ed., pp. 15–16). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
  8. "The mission of the APA [American Psychological Association] is to advance the creation, communication and application of psychological knowledge to benefit society and improve people's lives"; APA (2010). About APA. Retrieved ngày 20 tháng 10 năm 2010.
  9. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2010–11 Edition, Psychologists, on the Internet at bls.gov (visited ngày 8 tháng 7 năm 2010).
  10. Từ điển Từ nguyên Trực tuyến "Online Etymology Dictionary". (2001). "Psychology".
  11. “Classics in the History of Psychology – Marko Marulic – The Author of the Term "Psychology"”. Psychclassics.yorku.ca. Truy cập ngày 20 tháng 4 năm 2017. 
  12. (Steven Blankaart, p. 13) as quoted in "psychology n." A Dictionary of Psychology. Edited by Andrew M. Colman. Oxford University Press 2009. Oxford Reference Online. Oxford University Press. oxfordreference.com
  13. Derek Russell Davis (DRD), "psychology", in Richard L. Gregory (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Mind, second edition; Oxford University Press, 1987/2004; ISBN 978-0-19-866224-2 (pp. 763–764).
  14. Watson, John B. (1913). “Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It” (PDF). Psychological Review 20 (2): 158–177. doi:10.1037/h0074428
  15. The term "folk psychology" is itself contentious: see Daniel D. Hutto & Matthew Ratcliffe (eds.), Folk Psychology Re-Assessed; Dorndrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 2007; ISBN 978-1-4020-5557-7
  16. Okasha, Ahmed (2005). “Mental Health in Egypt”. The Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences 42 (2): 116–25. PMID 16342608
  17. "Aristotle's Psychology". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  18. Green, C.D. & Groff, P.R. (2003). Early psychological thought: Ancient accounts of mind and soul. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
  19. T.L. Brink. (2008) Psychology: A Student Friendly Approach. "Unit One: The Definition and History of Psychology." pp 9 .
  20. “Phương Dĩ Trí”. Viện Từ điển học và Bách khoa thư Việt Nam. 
  21. 1 2 Yeh Hsueh and Benyu Guo, "China", in Baker (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology (2012).
  22. 1 2 3 Anand C. Paranjpe, "From Tradition through Colonialism to Globalization: Reflections on the History of Psychology in India", in Brock (ed.), Internationalizing the History of Psychology (2006).
  23. Schwarz, K. A., & Pfister, R.: Scientific psychology in the 18th century: a historical rediscovery. In: Perspectives on Psychological Science, Nr. 11, p. 399-407.
  24. 1 2 3 4 Horst U.K. Gundlach, "Germany", in Baker (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology (2012).
  25. Alan Collins, "England", in Baker (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology (2012).
  26. 1 2 Leahey, History of Modern Psychology (2001), p. 60.
  27. Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik. Breitkopf u. Härtel. (Elements of Psychophysics)
  28. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2006). "Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt".
  29. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Ludy T. Benjamin, Jr., and David B. Baker, "The Internationalization of Psychology: A History", in Baker (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology (2012).
  30. 1 2 3 Miki Takasuna, "Japan", in Baker (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology (2012).
  31. 1 2 C. James Goodwin, "United States", in Baker (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology (2012).
  32. The Principles of Psychology (1890), with introduction by George A. Miller, Harvard University Press, 1983 paperback, ISBN 0-674-70625-0 (combined edition, 1328 pages)
  33. Leahey, History of Modern Psychology (2001), pp. 178–182.
  34. Cecilia Taiana, "Transatlantic Migration of the Disciplines of Mind: Examination of the Reception of Wundt's and Freud's Theories in Argentina", in Brock (ed.), Internationalizing the History of Psychology (2006).
  35. 1 2 3 Irina Sirotkina and Roger Smith, "Russian Federation", in Baker (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology (2012).
  36. Wozniak, R.H. (1999). Introduction to memory: Hermann Ebbinghaus (1885/1913). Classics in the history of psychology
  37. Windholz, G. (1997). “Ivan P. Pavlov: An overview of his life and psychological work”. American Psychologist 52 (9): 941–946. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.9.941
  38. 1 2 3 Nancy Tomes, "The Development of Clinical Psychology, Social Work, and Psychiatric Nursing: 1900–1980s", in Wallace & Gach (eds.), History of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology (2008).
  39. Franz Samuelson, "Organizing for the Kingdom of Behavior: Academic Battles and the Organizational Policies in the Twenties"; Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 21, January 1985.
  40. Hans Pols, "The World as Laboratory: Strategies of Field Research Developed by Mental Hygiene Psychologists in Toronto, 1920–1940" in Theresa Richardson & Donald Fisher (eds.), The Development of the Social Sciences in the United States and Canada: The Role of Philanthropy; Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing, 1999; ISBN 1-56750-405-1
  41. Sol Cohen, "The Mental Hygiene Movement, the Development of Personality and the School: The Medicalization of American Education"; History of Education Quarterly 23.2, Summer 1983.
  42. Vern L. Bullough, "The Rockefellers and Sex Research"; Journal of Sex Research 21.2, May 1985. "Their importance is hard to overestimate. In fact, in the period between 1914 and 1954, the Rockefellers were almost the sole support of sex research in the United States. The decisions made by their scientific advisers about the nature of the research to be supported and how it was conducted, as well as the topics eligible for research support, shaped the whole field of sex research and, in many ways, still continue to support it."
  43. Guthrie, Even the Rat was White (1998), Chapter 4: "Psychology and Race" (pp. 88–110). "Psychology courses often became the vehicles for eugenics propaganda. One graduate of the Record Office training program wrote, 'I hope to serve the cause by infiltrating eugenics into the minds of teachers. It may interest you to know that each student who takes psychology here works up his family history and plots his family tree.' Harvard, Columbia, Brown, Cornell, Wisconsin, and Northwestern were among the leading academic institutions teaching eugenics in psychology courses."
  44. Dorwin Cartwright, "Social Psychology in the United States During the Second World War", Human Relations 1.3, June 1948, p. 340; quoted in Cina, "Social Science For Whom?" (1981), p. 269.
  45. Catherine Lutz, "Epistemology of the Bunker: The Brainwashed and Other New Subjects of Permanent War", in Joel Pfister & Nancy Schnog (eds.), Inventing the Psychological: Toward a Cultural History of Emotional Life in America; Yale University Press, 1997; ISBN 0-300-06809-3
  46. Cina, "Social Science For Whom?" (1981), pp. 315–325.
  47. Herman, "Psychology as Politics" (1993), p. 288. "Had it come to fruition, CAMELOT would have been the largest, and certainly the most generously funded, behavioral research project in U.S. history. With a $4–6 million contract over a period of 3 years, it was considered, and often called, a veritable Manhattan Project for the behavioral sciences, at least by many of the intellectuals whose services were in heavy demand."
  48. Cocks, Psychotherapy in the Third Reich (1997), pp. 75–77.
  49. Cocks, Psychotherapy in the Third Reich (1997), p. 93.
  50. Cocks, Psychotherapy in the Third Reich (1997), pp. 86–87. "For Schultz-Hencke in this 1934 essay, life goals were determined by ideology, not by science. In the case of psychotherapy, he defined health in terms of blood, strong will, proficiency, discipline, (Zucht und Ordnung), community, heroic bearing, and physical fitness. Schultz-Hencke also took the opportunity in 1934 to criticize psychoanalysis for providing an unfortunate tendency toward the exculpation of the criminal."
  51. Jürgen Brunner, Matthias Schrempf, & Florian Steger, "Johannes Heinrich Schultz and National Socialism", Israel Journal of Psychiatry & Related Sciences 45.4, 2008. "Bringing these people to a right and deep understanding of every German's duty in the New Germany, such as preparatory mental aid and psychotherapy in general and in particular for persons to be sterilized, and for people having been sterilized, is a great, important and rewarding medical duty."
  52. Cocks, Psychotherapy in the Third Reich (1997), Chapter 14: "Reconstruction and Repression", pp. 351–375.
  53. Kozulin, Psychology in Utopia (1984), pp. 84–86. "Against such a background it is not at all surprising that psychoanalysis, as a theory that ventured to approach the forbidden but topical theme of sexual relations, was embraced by the newborn Soviet psychology. Psychoanalysis also attracted the interest of Soviet psychology as a materialist trend that had challenged the credentials of classical introspective psychology. The reluctance of the pre-Revolutionary establishment to propagate psychoanalysis also played a positive role in the post-Revolutionary years; it was a field uncompromised by ties to old-regime science." Though c.f. Hannah Proctor, "Reason Displaces All Love", The New Inquiry, 14 February 2014.
  54. Kozulin, Psychology in Utopia (1984), p. 22. "Stalin's purges of the 1930s did not spare Soviet psychologists. Leading Marxist philosophers earlier associated with psychology—including Yuri Frankfurt, Nikolai Karev, and Ivan Luppol—were executed in prison camps. The same fate awaited Alexei Gastev and Isaak Shipilrein. Those who survived lived in an atmosphere of total suspicion. [...] People who dominated their fields yesterday might be denounced today as traitors and enemies of the people, and by tomorrow their names might disappear from all public records. Books and newspapers were constantly being recalled from libraries to rid them of 'obsolete' names and references."
  55. Kozulin, Psychology in Utopia (1984), pp. 25–26, 48–49.
  56. Mei-ge, Li; Lian-rong, Guan (tháng 1 năm 1987). “Brief Introduction of the Chinese Psychological Society”. International Journal of Psychology 22 (4): 479–482. doi:10.1080/00207598708246790
  57. Chin & Chin, Psychological Research in Communist China (1969), pp. 5–9.
  58. Chin & Chin, Psychological Research in Communist China (1969), pp. 9–17. "The Soviet psychology that Peking modeled itself upon was a Marxist-Leninist psychology with a philosophical base in dialectical materialism and a newly added label, Pavlovianism. This new Soviet psychology leaned heavily on Lenin's theory of reflection, which was unearthed in his two volumes posthumously published in 1924. Toward the late twenties, a group of Soviet research psychologists headed by Vygotskii, along with Luria and Leont'ev, laid the groundwork for a Marxist-Leninist approach to psychic development."
  59. Chin & Chin, Psychological Research in Communist China (1969), pp. 18–24.
  60. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Wade Pickren & Raymond D. Fowler, "Professional Organizations", in Weiner (ed.), Handbook of Psychology (2003), Volume 1: History of Psychology.
  61. 1 2 Irmingard Staeuble, "Psychology in the Eurocentric Order of the Social Sciences: Colonial Constitution, Cultural Imperialist Expansion, Postcolonial Critique" in Brock (ed.), Internationalizing the History of Psychology (2006).
  62. C. James Goodwin, "United States", in Baker (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the History of Psychology (2012).
  63. For example, see Oregon State Law, Chapter 675 (2013 edition) at Statutes & Rules Relating to the Practice of Psychology.
  64. Judy E. Hall and George Hurley, "North American Perspectives on Education, Training, Licensing, and Credentialing", in Weiner (ed.), Handbook of Psychology (2003), Volume 8: Clinical Psychology.
  65. T.S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1st. ed., Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Pr., 1962.
  66. Beveridge, Allan (2002). “Time to abandon the subjective–objective divide?”. Psychiatric Bulletin 26 (3): 101–103. doi:10.1192/pb.26.3.101
  67. Peterson, C. (2009, 23 May). "Subjective and objective research in positive psychology: A biological characteristic is linked to well-being". Psychology Today. Retrieved 20 April 2010.
  68. Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 9.
  69. Teo, The Critique of Psychology (2005), pp. 36–37. "Methodologism means that the method dominates the problem, problems are chosen in subordination to the respected method, and psychology has to adopt without question, the methods of the natural sciences. [...] From an epistemological and ontological-critical as well as from a human-scientific perspective the experiment in psychology has limited value (for example, only for basic psychological processes), given the nature of the psychological subject matter, and the reality of persons and their capabilities."
  70. Teo, The Critique of Psychology (2005), p. 120. "Pervasive in feminist critiques of science, with the exception of feminist empiricism, is the rejection of positivist assumptions, including the assumption of value-neutrality or that research can only be objective if subjectivity and emotional dimensions are excluded, when in fact culture, personality, and institutions play significant roles (see Longino, 1990; Longino & Doell, 1983). For psychology, Grimshaw (1986) discussed behaviorism's goals of modification, and suggested that behaviorist principles reinforced a hierarchical position between controller and controlled and that behaviorism was in principle an antidemocratic program."

Tài liệu tham khảo

WikiPedia: Tâm_lý_học http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Ebbinghaus/wozniak.h... http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Krstic/marulic.htm http://www.hls-dhs-dss.ch/textes/f/F008286.php http://commonweb.unifr.ch/artsdean/pub/gestens/f/a... http://dictionary-psychology.com http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=psycholog... http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/ENTRY.html?su... http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-good-life/... http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/reason-displaces-a... http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-psycho...